Before Atomic Habits: The Case for High-Impact, Time-Bound Change
Not everything needs to be a lasting habit. Two boat burning changes I'm making right now.
There are certain life changes we universally recognize as beneficial—getting into shape, saving for retirement, cutting back on drinking alcohol. For these long-term goals, gradual habit-building approaches (like those explored in the book Atomic Habits) work wonderfully.
But what about when we want to explore something entirely outside our comfort zone? When we're not ready to commit to permanent change but need to rapidly gain experience to determine if a new path is worth pursuing?
When we're not yet convinced we need lasting change, incrementalism is too slow—especially in environments that demand rapid adaptation. In a world evolving at breakneck speed (AI being a prime example), relying solely on small tweaks leaves us behind the curve.
This article isn't about replacing the wisdom of gradual habit formation. Rather, it introduces a complementary approach: the time-bound forcing function. Unlike traditional habit-building, which prioritizes sustainability, this method optimizes for speed, knowledge acquisition, and rapid adaptation—helping you quickly determine which new directions deserve your long-term commitment.
Staying Nimble as You Age
Why is this new approach so important?
As we get older, we tend to stick with what we know, this is the death of the creative mind — we MUST manually force major uncomfortable shifts to maintain long-term cognitive flexibility.
Regularly embracing radical shifts keeps your mental plasticity sharp, proving to yourself that you can adapt, no matter how deeply ingrained your habits are. These radical shifts disrupt established norms, creating an opportunity for neuroplasticity. The brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections is heightened when faced with novel and challenging environments. This is how we maintain mental agility as we age (Draganski et al., 2004).
This is especially crucial now that AI is accelerating change across nearly every industry. The pace of innovation means that skills and workflows that were relevant just a few years ago (months ago?) may already be outdated. To stay ahead of the curve, professionals must develop a habit of forced adaptation—diving headfirst into new tools, methodologies, and technologies rather than waiting for gradual, comfortable transitions.
Those who can rapidly adjust to these shifts will remain competitive, while those who resist may find themselves left behind. As Naval Ravikant wisely observed, "And so as you age, you should have wisdom. That's your substitute for the raw horsepower of intelligence going down." Staying sharp isn’t just about maintaining knowledge—it’s about continuously expanding and connecting the dots of wisdom by constantly embracing new challenges.
The Power of Burning the Boats
The phrase "burning the boats" comes from ancient military history. When Hernán Cortés arrived in Mexico in 1519, he ordered his men to burn their ships, eliminating any possibility of retreat. This decisive action left only one option: succeed in their conquest or perish. This extreme commitment transformed his soldiers' mindset and determination.
In personal transformation, this principle applies powerfully. Small tweaks keep you safely within your comfort zone, while the most profound changes demand initial struggle and discomfort. By deliberately removing your escape routes—deleting the old app, canceling the subscription, giving away your old device—you create the psychological conditions for real change (Deci & Ryan, 2000).
When partial commitment leaves your old habits as an easy fallback, your brain remains split between old and new pathways. But full immersion forces rapid adaptation. The initial higher cognitive load actually accelerates learning (Sweller, 1988), and by eliminating options to revert to familiar patterns, you create optimal conditions for new neural pathways to form, solidifying the new behavior (Lally et al., 2010).
Two Experiments I’m Running Right Now
The recent destruction of my home in the LA fires marked a profound turning point in my life. Losing everything created a rare opportunity: the chance to reimagine my entire approach across multiple domains. Rather than making small adjustments, I've embraced radical changes in several areas. While I'll detail what proves most effective in future posts—eventually transitioning successful experiments into sustainable habits in the Atomic Habits tradition—today I'm focusing on two significant shifts I've implemented as a way to keep me technically nimble.
#1: Android, Truly, All-In, for Six Months
Yes, I’m selling my iPhone. Imagine an Apple die-hard ditching their iPhone entirely for half a year—no safety net, no second device. The first few weeks would be frustrating. Muscle memory would fail. Simple tasks would feel foreign (how the hell do I paste something to my Mac?). But by month two or three, something shifts: new workflows emerge, and the new system becomes second nature. This person has now achieved fluency in Android in a way that casual tinkering never could. For me, this isn't about just "switching phones", but rather rounding out my thinking on the future of AI at the hardware level. I believe Google has a massive head start here, and I want to be witnessing this unfold at the forefront.
By removing the familiar cues and routines of my iPhone environment, I'm forcing myself to engage with Android in its entirety. This immersive learning experience accelerates the learning process by minimizing distractions and maximizing focus. The initial frustration of switching to Android is the brain working through the high cognitive load. This is the brain using neuroplasticity to form new connections.
#2: Three Months with the Arc Browser
Arc is the hip browser of the tech world—sleek, minimalist, and packed with new features that challenge the way we think about web browsing. Built by The Browser Company, Arc reimagines the browsing experience with features like split-screen multitasking, built-in notes, AI enhancements, and a unique command bar. Some might call it a browser for power users, but I find it more minimal and clever, yet at the same time a massive mental shift in how we interact with the web.
A longtime Chrome user who forces themselves to use Arc exclusively for several months will go through a similar process of adaptation. Initially, everything feels inefficient—the UI is different, the tabs are in a strange place, and long-standing browsing habits are disrupted. But by the end, they’ve either discovered a better workflow that suits their needs or gained a deep understanding of why they prefer Chrome. Either way, the experiment leads to a real, informed perspective—not just a half-hearted attempt at change.
How to Implement High-Impact Change
Here’s how to structure a radical shift:
Identify a significant change — Select something truly impactful: a new operating system, an alternative productivity tool, or a substantial lifestyle modification.
Eliminate the escape route – Burn the boats. Make it impossible to revert to old habits too soon.
Define temporal boundaries – Establish a specific timeframe (typically 4-12 weeks) that demands full commitment while preventing exhaustion.
Fully immerse – Treat it as an adventure, embrace discomfort, and track your progress. Once the experiment ends, decide what to keep and what to discard.
Conclusion — Dare to Make the Leap
Consistency (and a measured approached to getting there) is undeniably important, especially for known lifelong habits we want to cultivate. But for bigger and bolder initiatives into the unknown, mindset that welcomes radical change will always outpace one that clings to micro-tweaks. With time-bounding, you're far less likely to fail the trial. Sometimes, the best way forward isn't another small step—it's a leap. Burn the boats, force the shift, and see just how adaptable you really are. My gut says you’ll surprise yourself.
Good luck, and I'll report back on Android, Arc, and others.
Looking for more insights and real-time conversation? Join our private community here. Previously paying substack member? Search your inbox for an invite from Circle: noreply@circle.so
References
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National academy press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66-69.
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311-312.
Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H., Potts, H. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European journal of social psychology, 40(6), 998-1009.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
After hearing how important it is to strength train enough times, I joined a gym last year so I could “test out” lifting weights, something I haven’t done since high school. I followed a program from a book that inspired me to lift in the first place (Bigger, Leaner, Stronger). After a few months, I was shocked to see real muscles on my normally skinny/athletic frame. I then went all in and built out a home gym with great but secondhand equipment from fb marketplace. 9 months later, I’m still lifting every week and at 48, am stronger than I’ve ever been.
My next change is trying to learn to swim properly. To force it, I signed up for my first sprint triathlon. Now I have a deadline and a real life need to be able to do the thing I want to learn or I face potential drowning. That’s a great motivator!
A decade ago I needed to use an android for work and absolutely hated it. However, given how crummy Apple AI is, I’m guessing, newer androids are a heck of a lot better in that category. Curious to see which one you prefer.
So sorry to hear about your house. What a profound change.
On learning and change, I recently found this article about the evolutionary pros and cons of learning quickly and adapting to ones environment:
Study: Optimal learning in noisy ecological niches
Organisms that respond quickly to changing environments have an advantage over those that don’t. However, reacting too quickly wastes time and energy in tracking meaningless environmental changes. The authors derive a scaling law that shows that an organism’s learning rate should change as the square root of the rate of environmental change.
They also ask what happens when organisms seek to engineer the time scales in their environments — adding structure or erasing structure through niche construction.
Lastly, the researchers looked at how learning and metabolic costs intersect. For small, short-lived animals, learning costs exceed metabolic costs. Conversely, metabolic costs dominate for larger, longer-lived animals, or for those whose environments change slowly, promoting longer memories.
https://www.santafe.edu/news-center/news/study-optimal-learning-in-noisy-ecological-niches